The top court issued notice seeking the Centre’s response and the assistance of the attorney general in the matter.
The bench observed under Section 5(2) of the Dam Safety Act, a national committee comprising members prescribed under Section 5(1) was required to be constituted within a period of 60 days from the date of the law’s commencement, and it was required to be reconstituted every three years thereafter.
“We are informed that no such national committee has been constituted so far. Even the rules/regulations regarding the constitution, composition or functions of the said national committee have not been formulated,” said the bench’s order.
The court noted Tamil Nadu government’s submission on the Centre creating a new supervisory committee led by the chairperson of the national dam safety authority by an office memorandum of November 21, 2024, in supersession of the supervisory committee constituted by the top court in 2014.
“It further appears there is no provision in the Dam Safety Act prescribing the constitution of a supervisory committee,” the bench said, “and it further appears a supervisory committee was constituted by this court in an earlier round of litigation with respect to the Mullaperiyar Dam and the union of India has also conceptualised the constitution of the supervisory committee, maybe in terms of the judgment of this court.”
The attorney general’s assistance was sought by the court over the constitution of the national committee and giving effect to other provisions of the Dam Safety Act.
It directed the AG to take instructions from the national dam safety authority on its responsibility under the law.
The bench, during the hearing, considered passing an order for a safety audit of the dam by an expert panel to allay any fears surrounding the British-era dam, which is situated in Kerala but controlled by Tamil Nadu.
Krishnamurthy submitted Tamil Nadu had formed an expert panel to assess the structural stability of the dam but required approval by the national authority on dam safety in the upcoming meeting on January 10.
The safety of the dam witnessed several rounds of litigation in the apex court and has remained a bone of contention between Kerala and Tamil Nadu as its water is considered a lifeline for five Tamil Nadu districts.
The top court in 2014 ruled in favour of Tamil Nadu and said the dam’s structure was safe while allowing the water level to be kept at 142 feet and constituted a supervisory committee to assess its safety from time to time.
While Tamil Nadu has contended the dam was safe all along, the Kerala government said it was unsafe and a higher water level could endanger lives downstream in case of a breach and sought its decommissioning.