The prosecution added that the murder was premeditated and deliberate, highlighting that Greeshma destroyed Sharon’s dreams and aspirations without showing any remorse.
The defense, represented by lawyer Sasthamangalam Ajith Kumar, argued against the death penalty, stating that the evidence was circumstantial.
The defense claimed that Greeshma, facing mental distress, had repeatedly tried to end her relationship with Sharon, but he refused and resorted to blackmail.
They alleged Sharon had used private images to intimidate her and even recorded intimate visuals, causing her extreme mental trauma.