But does not the art form also go through changes? For example, we see a lot of interpretations, re-readings in choreography, and fast-paced, passion-filled elements emerge. The trend is also seen in Kathak as well.

Yes, this has been happening. But what is more important is not just catering to the entertainment part; it is necessary that an artist also educates the audience on the aesthetics of the art. This should be done by keeping intact the essence of the art form. The key lies in balancing creativity with tradition.

What is the challenge in this?

The biggest challenge is good training. You need to be trained well in your technique to know the basics, the deep aspects, and the content, yet know how to balance it with what the audience would require and how it should be presented before them without diluting the tradition of the art form. This training nowadays is an issue.

Also is the commitment of the dancer to the art. There are many taking it up, wanting to make reels, perform soon, get on stage…but how many invest the time to truly internalise the art form?

What is it that is needed here now in the field of classical dance?

We need more avenues for in-depth study. There are few institutions dedicated to serious research and training in classical dance. Much like IITs or IIMs, we need premier institutes for classical arts. Where not just art is taught, but the deeper elements of it are researched upon and understood, and innovations made and recorded.

Greater government and corporate patronage, along with better arts education from an early age, are essential. After all, culture defines a community. And art defines culture to a very large extent. I hope the government takes note of this.